The year that changed it all.
After getting rocked by Pluto’s move into my second house over the past couple of days, I’ve had to re-group a little to get the blog moving again. This Pluto thing ain’t no joke–lemme tell you..
So returning to the scene of the crime, 1913, before and after, we’ve looked at Woodrow Wilson, Albert Pike, John D. Rockefeller, Meyer Amschel Rothschild and Jacob Schiff, specifically, as their charts have played out in what I would call the greatest coup of all time. We looked at Pike’s nefarious network of illuminated influence and the incredulous prophecy that he shared with Giuseppe Mazinni, founder of “The Illuminati 2.0” and The Mafia, how it has eerily played out and that the conditions for WWIII are self-assembling before our very eyes. We then looked at each ones chart to determine if there were some commonalities, a through line to see if we could connect aspects with intent. While I never clearly stated it, I believe that the four following planet/saspects do indeed play into the “amoral” behavior exhibited by this rogues gallery. The preponderance of Capricorn and Aquarius in the charts, especially Sun, Moon and Venus for Capricorn and Mars for Aquarius means something.
Capricorn and Aquarius are transpersonal planets and what I mean by that is, that individuals with heavily aspected charts in these two signs tend to have “larger” concerns, and project their interests and activities outwards, towards the world at large, trough business, government, economics and the re-formation of society, the latter, particularly as it relates to Aquarius.
Just have a look at Dick Cheney’s chart. He has Sun in Aquarius, Venus in Capricorn and Mercury in Aquarius. Venus in Capricorn lends itself towards a cold and unfeeling character in relationships, using personal relationships for personal gain and Aquarius, though capable of great genius and great humanity, it can also be a sign that is driven towards some radical. ideological end, especially as we have seen in the chart of Saul Alinsky. I think Cheney (Virgo Rising) is the perfect, modern, exemplar of how these aspects play out in a negative fashion and are manifested in parlaying his personal contacts through, The CFR, Halliburton, Brown, Kellog and Root, into a spot in The White House, no-bid contracts and helping re-build the infrastructure of the country that he helped bomb back into the middle ages, all wrapped up in stars and stripes, coldly exploiting the grief and fear of the American public to invade Iraq and get the party started on the heels of 911. That’s not to say that there are not positive, progressive and inspired examples of these two planets/signs and my good friend Twilight would take me to task if I didn’t proclaim such. All I am trying to establish is, is that people with a chart that has a preponderance of transpersonal planets/signsplacments, from Sag to Pisces, 9th to 12th houses, are more inclined to deal with the issues of the world at large, and if they do not have other aspects to support a positive or generative perspective, I do feel that they are more than casually inclined to be susceptible towards a radical disposition, especially one that sees them as the agency of elite rule, and a law unto themselves.
I also noted that The Moon in Virgo also showed a fair amount in the small sample set. Having been raised by two parents, both of whom have Moon in Virgo, I can personally attest to the critical nature of such a placement. I could only begin to imagine how that would manifest in the personality that had a much larger stake in the game and how it would not just be their offspring that they could be overly critical of, but the world at large, seeing the masses as fallible fodder, imperfect and exploitable.
There was also a fair amount of Aries involved in some of the charts, particularly Morgan, Bismarck, Herzl and Marx. While Aries is not a transpersonal sign and in fact is the distillation of pure, personality, it also can lack objectivity and be so will directed that it too can become deeply committed to an ideological bent that is driven and colored by the sign. For Bismarck, it was ultimately war and his open aggression France, Bavaria, Poland, England and The Benelux countries. If we are to believe that Pike and Bismarck were illuminated brethren and Otto was just doing his duty, then everything falls into place.
While Bismarck and Germany were kicking ass in the euro-theater, even getting The Brits to the point of surrender, there was another layer unfolding beneath the global conflict.
Theordore Herzl (Binyamin Ze’ev Herzl) was a journalist and more well known as the father of modern Zionism. Herzl (Taurus) was born and raised in Hungary, then later educated in Vienna. As a young journalist, he saw a number of demonstrations attacking Jewish families and figures, accusing them of spying and other nefarious activities. Herzl was eventually moved by witnessing these conditions to begin to see that the solution for such a disparity between Jews and non-Jews was for Jewish people to have their own state. He became a voiciferous advocate of “Return” and worked within the highest and most influential circles within Europe in order to facilitate this. My good friend, Mo Sage and I tend to slightly differ on the intention of people throughout history. He believes that most people are uninformed and are driven by their ideology, along with certain social conditioning. In essence, if one is born into a family that uses ritual abuse as a form of behavior modification and the ensuant personality is one that is driven by these soul shattering, early experiences, that they cannot in some ways be held accountable for their crimes against humanity (hello ex-president to be). He believes that most people do things because they somehow believe they are right, if misguided. Now this principle could certainly be applied to Herzl and in fact, it seems as though that the motivation for his radical re-orientation of Jewish culture and community is born out of such experiences and forged his ideology in that particular direction. Now that said, I believe that this is where the pivotal moment in modern history takes place. While Germany has England on the ropes, ready to surrender, surrender to terms called, “satus quo ante” (Let’s call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.) the zionist faction, led by Herzl and others quickly moved to get England to not surrender, that they could still yet win the war, by drawing the US into the fray. The terms were steep though. If this could be done, then the zionists would want Palestine as their own as the new home of “Israel.” The land at the time was under the light dominion of Turkey and England had as much right to annex the land as if The US today could give away New Zealand. But the terms were agreed to (The Balfour Doctrine), and the rest is history. The US, as we have seen was brought into the conflict with the sinking of The Lusitania, all on the heels of the election of Woody Wilson, who would open the coffers of the US Treasury to the international banking community, led by the old money houses of Europe, particularly The House Of Rothschild and of course, the attendant taxation, which was passed in order to feed the burgeoning debt and indebtedness.
So now we have the groundwork of the international banking community and the promise to deliver the state of Israel for the zionists, led by Herzl, all falling into place from 1913 forward. Germany of course loses the war and has economic sanctions and reparations imposed on them from The Treaty Of Versailles are so harsh that they cripple their economy and the spirit of The German people to the point where they are desperate for a leader that will deliver them from the economic and cultural abyss that they were stranded in. That man, would be Adolph Hitler and he would set the next stage through the horror of WWIi (the second phase of Pike’s prophecy) for the formation of Israel, where to this day, we are witnessing the bloody and tragic manifestation of those events, put into place, from 1913.
Tomorrow, we will look at the final phases of the creation of the nation state, who, what, where, and why it went down the way it did and why we are now paying the price for such a rapid and aggressive escalation of policy.