271750_main1Come, join my corner in The New World Order . . .

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” — Joseph Goebbells

EDITORS NOTE. They have just announced that the new name of the proposed “Freedom Tower in NYC aka the new WTC, will be called, “The One World Trade Center.”

I’ve been dealing with moving and decoupling from my domestic life, amongst other issues, so I haven’t taken on the big pieces as of late, but I have promised my pal, Twilight to do a little Siskel and Ebert on “The New World Order.” Twilight, like my very good friend, didge player extraordinaire, Stephen Kent is from England, where the idea of socialism is actually a reality they are quite used to, having been indoctrinated into via their respective English upbringings and while The U.S. is currently a soft socialist model, it has had the trappings of free-market capitalism for most of it’s existence, though we are now aware that “free market” actually refers to the fact that white collar criminals who have absconded with billions over the past five years, are still free to do what they do best. Pilfer. If it wasn’t for Bernie Maddoff’s smug and arrogant confession to his sons, he’d still be fleecing people begging for a 12% return with no questions asked. But that’s a different story.

Twilight believes that the only way that we can solve our problems is to submit to a world government and a world currency, a unifying theme, principle and body that would determine the rule of law, for everyone, equally. This is what HG Wells and his “Fabian Socialists” have been working towards for decades (much more on Wells later) and in theory and principle, it all sounds fine, warm and fuzzy, because thanks to Freud, most people believe that we are all just really neanderthals beneath The Brooks Brothers suits, just waiting to club someone if no one is looking and that there are a smarter, more enlightened group of people that can save us from ourselves and through the rule of law and force, united under one unifying system, we can tame the beast within us and live peacefully, thanks to the exalted beneficence of those who are better trained, smarter and more refined than the rest of us.

With Neptune in Aquarius and Jupiter in Aquarius, rapidly approaching a major conjunction, the ideal of a New World order might never be closer. Aquarius represents fairness and equality. While Libra seeks balance and fairness in one-on-one relationships, Aquarius addresses it from a societal standpoint and an ideal such as a “New World Order” has immense appeal during this Neptune/Jupiter/Aquarius phase. Aquarius is also the sign of the media, mass media, radio, t.v. and the internet. I equate music and film more with Pisces, but the vox populi at this very moment in ensconced radio, t,v, and the net. This is where the memes for The NWO will be launched into the collective mind.

One of the things we learned about the last election is how much politics has become marketing and vice versa. From Mad Ave, Tavistock, to SRI, to Langley, we have seen how strategies are borne out of the need to not just capture the public’s mind share, but to colonize the entire personality through beliefs. It was quite evident during The Reagan era, even more so when the conservative christian community were mobilized to support the dubious Bush agenda without question. With Barack Obama, we witnessed the very same thing, catapulting a personality forward on the promise of “hope” and the vapors of “change.” The nebulous nature of the platform has the power to keep us waiting for a very long time as “hope” is a state and not a destination and as a state it can always remain an ideal, not a reality. I have already written about this especially as it relates to Edward Bernays (Freud’s nephew) and how he essentially created the field of mass psychology in The US during the 20th century, creating everything from covert psyops for United Fruit in Central America, to working Alcoa and Reynolds to get the public to accept fluoride (a byproduct of aluminum processing) in the public water supply. Bernays is the godfather of mass mind control and public perception. His work was funded at times by The Rockfeller Foundation, including “The War Of The Worlds,” (HG Wells again) produced and performed by The Mercury Theater and a different Welles, Orson. A side note, here is a rare radio interview with Orson Welles and H.G. Wells.

.So if we are socially conditioned and I believe we are, then the social conditioning for the acceptance of The NWO is on and the Aquarian connection will begin to shape and foment ideas and idealizations in our psyches in such a way that as it converges with a massive, pre-planned, downward turn in the the global economy, it will be shaped by the voices of hope and the images of salvation and oneness. It will be broadcast in such a way that it’s allure will be irresistible. I recently saw an advert for a British cell phone company that was a take off on a flash mob event held at Grand Central station, however, instead of becoming statue still, in the advert people of all stripes began to dance in viral fashion. We’re supposed to believe that the good will is contagious and that we can set aside our differences, simply by dancing. I actually believe this, but I don’t need a group of actors posing as real people to sell me this idea. I chose this advert because I believe that we’re going to get hit with the soft marketing, vis-a-vis Neptune/Jupiter and the push for The NWO. Sure, we’ll get talking heads, hired ones at that to promote these ideas with increasing frequency, but we’ll also get movies, commercials, viral videos, and music paving the way, seasoning our psyches to embrace such ideals. Is this a bad thing?

When people of common sense embrace an ideal like The New World Order, it seems quite sensible on the surface, especially as a panacea for the artificially created conditions (like the economic meltdown) which makes alternatives like The NWO an essential component for social order and not just some utopian luxury. But are the people that are offering us these solutions the very same ones that have created the problems in the first place? Is it yet another ponzi scheme of mass proportion? A bait and switch of grand and elaborate design? And what happens if you just don’t want to play the game? Is there an opt-out for those that are unwilling to concede to the new global law? How are they dealt with? Will they go through an assimilation process which will no doubt be heavy on the shame and guilt side of things? Is there a country they can be shipped off to, sort of the modern equivalent of Australia? What happens if the process does not go as smoothly as some would like? And lastly, who are these people driving The NWO express and why are they better suited than you or I to determine not just lifestyles we wish to lead, but the direction of life on the planet itself. Does their royal bloodline or their Ivy League pedigree or fraternal ties make them more morally superior and and intellectually qualified in order to run the show? And before you answer any of those rhetorical questions, who are these people anyway? Can someone who has great antipathy towards Bush I, who openly called for a New World Order during Desert Storm and the rather clandestine broker of war, Henry Kissinger who has also been calling for a NWO as of late, reconcile their feelings towards these two men and what they stand for and the new social paradigm that Gordon Brown, Angela Merckel and others are also advocating?

I think we’re in the throes of the early marketing phase with Neptune/Jupiter/Aquarius and when Uranus moves into Aries, we’ll witness the conceptual morph into action, however, while the forces of global unification move into action, the will of the people will also be ignited by the fiery and rebellious Martian/Uranian connection. I’ll hold the space for a true world peace, but I would not be surprised if under Uranus in Aries, we will ultimately and ironically witness a variant version of a war of the worlds.

Here’s a few NWO quotes for you to ruminate on:

“We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” — Mikhail Gorbachev 1987

“We must establish a new world order based on justice, on equity, and on peace.” — Fidel Castro United Nations 1979

“This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long – We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” — David Rockefeller Sept. 23, 1994

“My country’s history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order.” — Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975

“We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the rule of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders.” — President George Bush 1991

“National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing of a new world order.” — Adolph Hitler during World War II

“When the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.” — H. G. Wells, in his book entitled “The New World Order” (1939)

Be Sociable, Share!
5 Responses to “Aquarius And The Marketing Of A New World Order”
  1. Proponents of communism and the NWO (two sides of the same coin, really) neglect to realize that systems in evolution tend toward complexity–not simplicity or unification. As systems evolve, they become more complex. We now see that chaos (the jungle) is really just complexity. The complexity theory proposes an organic, “non-linear” model of self-organization as the driving force of history — a network of interconnected communities — not a single world order.

    Unfortunately, many otherwise intelligent and kind-hearted individuals are duped by the lofty ideal of a unified, benevolent governance (our God-centric conditioning for 1000s of years) instead of personal responsibility & accountability within complex and interconnected communities.

  2. Okay, Robert : Round 1 ;-)

    The first word I tripped over in your post was “indoctrinated” in regard to my (and Steve’s) British background and lifestyle. That word smacks of force.
    The kind of so-called socialism in Britain, Scandinavia and parts of Europe isn’t the kind which calls for indoctrination. Americans have a twisted view of what goes on over there, I fear.

    The next word I tripped over was “submit” (as in submitting to a NWO). Again this smacks of force. There’s an underlying paranoia throughout your otherwise erudite and interesting piece, Robert. But I have sensed this quite a bit in the USA. Y’all may have good reason for it, but I don’t share it.

    Yes, I do think that in due course the world will need to be unified. I don’t see this as coming about in my lifetime though, nor probably in yours, unless there’s some kind of devastating catastrophe which calls for it to happen. That is not unlikely. If all things bumble along as they are at present though, I’d say it’d be at least another century, maybe two, before true world unity by consent will come about. It will come about – it’ll have to unless the race regresses. That’s another option – regression.

    You appear to see a sinister undercurrent in almost everything. While I am not the Pollyanna I might appear to be at times, and can be quite cynical about politicians and power brokers, I do not immediately think everyone is about to get me, or is scheming to take over the world. That is the stuff of movies and fiction.

    When the argument is distilled – it comes down to the age old contrast between left and right. We aren’t going to agree. You are not going to convince me, nor I you.

    With reference to CVB’s comment, above – “personal responsibility and accountability within complex and interconnected communities” – that’s been tried for centuries. There has to be progression, something different and more suited to the way life is going to become in future centuries. Why would personal responsibility and accountability disappear under a world government anyway? I don’t see the two as incompatible at all.

  3. Hi Twilight,

    You’re right there isn’t much convincing either way that’s going to take place, but this is a good exercise for us to engage in healthy debate, without taking things personally.

    My feling is, is that humanity hasn’t had much of a shot at really seeing what it can do without outside interference and allowed to adjust and evolve on it’s own.

    I beleive that our reality is constantly mediated by war, economic desparity, social unrest, etc. I believe that most of these are all condtions that artifically generated in order to keep us separate, engaged in struggle and always looking for someone in a higher position to solve out things for us.

    I won’t go into granular detail here and quote chapter and verse from the conspiracy bible, but in America, we dealt with The Vietnam War for close to 15 years. People John Stockwell, a former CIA operative in Nam, Angola and other places blew the lid on the war, exposing America;s role in taking over the heroin trade in “The Golden Triangle” from The French. The war tore at the very fabric of our society and might have cost John Kennedy his life. Black families, many of whom had young men, unable to attend college go off to war and those young men either died, returned as junkies or struggled to find themselves in a world that didn’t fit or care. A great cross-section of the Black American experience was lost due to that war and in retrospect what idid it accomplish? The rukes of engagement put forth by Kennedy’s “wise men” who were now advising Johnson, basically insured that the war was not winnable. So tell me again, after all these years, why we were there? Why did we sell parts to The Russians, who in turn used those parts to craft weapons, which were then sold to North Vietnam, which in turn then used said weapons back on The US?

    The first, great, depression was another, socially engineered event as is this current financial criss, all with the intention of distracting and dividing the masses, making them compliant consumers, mied in their own credit morass.

    Some might simply say that this is “human nature” and perhaps they are correct, but I truly believe that our definition of humanity has never been truly able flower and express itself without some force exerting some form of influence, for financial gain or political position.

    I am of the mindset that we are setting on technology that far exceeds that of the public sector’s knowledge and that these technologies could easily level the playing field between the haves and have nots and that if those in power were much more invested in the type of golden age that we a capable of experiencing, they would release said technologies and then set about by truly being enlightened stewards of the planet. But alas, from what we have experienced recently, “the haves” want to “have more” and are far more interested in accruing power than sharing it.

    I have to say, that if you were in some high position on an enlightened council that goverened our affairs, I would feel fairly safe regarding your intentions because (and I am biased because I’ve seen your chart :-) ) you’re pretty balanced and your life path seems to have been one, that like water, has risen to it’s own level. You haven’t succumbed to the psychopathology of the will to power. However, those that are in power rarely rise to those positions out of altruism or the need to serve. They get there because they are invested in power.

    I have a great feeling for humanity as a whole. I do my best to see and feel the spirit of creation in all people and in all things, even the “Dick Cheney’s” of the world, because to not do so, would engender a sense of separation, however, I can judicious in how I percieve events and people and choose whethere or not they’re a good fit for me. It’s an often rigorous process that I am constantly tested on, so I have to revise my perceptions on a fairly frequent basis.

    At the end of the day, we will have to reconcile what I call “the disparity between the spirit and the will” and rejoin the wholeness of the universe in it’s most powerful and dramatic sense.

    This is where quantum physics comes into play.

    I have to go now and be a responsible daddy.

    :-)

  4. Thank you, Robert, for (as usual) articulating in a coherent fashion the thoughts that swirl around in my head – and taking the time to document historical forces at play. Interesting (and most likely accurate) observation about the Neptune-Jupiter conjunction and the ideal of the NWO – I guess I’m hoping that Chiron’s involvement in that conjunction will help wake people up to the painful reality behind the illusion??

    On a more personal note, I’ve got some serious ancestral karma to work off… I’m a descendant of Bernays – my grandpa worked for “Uncle Eddie” in his PR firm back in the day…

  5. That’s rich. Your grandpappy worked for Bernays! Uncle Eddie? Wow. Bernays was one cagey dude, without much of a moral compass. I think that Bernays sauce is actually named after him.

    Well, you’vr got some good pedigree though, as I’m sure your granfather must have been pretty sharp to hang with old Ed.

    Just to let you know that you’re not alone in these sorts of things, my great, great grandfather on my fathers maternal line, was a master mason. I must publicly state though, that I have never been a mason in this lifetime. :-)

Leave a Reply